15th june > @ 17412 > BULLS ENTER

[CreditViolet]

Re: 25jan-sensex:18362- BEARS ATTACK with a stop of....

You have used the word definition , not me.
No double standards anywhere.

Wait, so you neither have the definition or evidence but you make sure to lay down the accusations first?

 

[rajsingh]

Re: 25jan-sensex:18362- BEARS ATTACK with a stop of....

The evidence was posted earlier.

 

[uasish]

Re: 25jan-sensex:18362- BEARS ATTACK with a stop of....

http://www.traderji.com/151380-post8.html

We all know this was a joke ,never intended to malign the respected FM,but now if somebody harps on this stubbornly in defense of FM & claims his status is degraded,would not it be like punishing R.K.Laxman than giving him National Award.

 

[CreditViolet]

Re: 25jan-sensex:18362- BEARS ATTACK with a stop of....

The evidence was posted earlier.

Exactly. And similar evidence was posted against you where you were 'abusing' members in a similiar way

 

[rajsingh]

Re: 25jan-sensex:18362- BEARS ATTACK with a stop of....

Good point. Though I don't see any FM in that post.

 

[rajsingh]

Re: 25jan-sensex:18362- BEARS ATTACK with a stop of....

Exactly. And similar evidence was posted against you where you were 'abusing' members in a similiar way

So we keep on abusing ? Right

 

[CreditViolet]

Re: 25jan-sensex:18362- BEARS ATTACK with a stop of....

So we keep on abusing ? Right

Now you admit your guilt. Its none of my concern really, you can keep abusing and accuse others of abusing, your choice.

 

[rajsingh]

Re: 25jan-sensex:18362- BEARS ATTACK with a stop of....

I've done no such thing.

Cheers

 

[Czar]

Re: 25jan-sensex:18362- BEARS ATTACK with a stop of....

Guys this is escalating throughout the forum, seniors / mods please check your advance & shut the threads which are springing out of nowhere... any one side backing away wont make them smaller....

 

[amitt29]

Re: 25jan-sensex:18362- BEARS ATTACK with a stop of....

I guess things are going over board. I dont think all this is required. YES suduko was being attacked by many senior members for no major wrong done by him. We all were enjoying these threads till now but not any more atleast for me. There is no problem having a view point and having an attitude. CV you are extremely respected out here and will be. Leave him sir, let go .... it was ok till yesterday, we all took it as humour but once the victim feels that its hurting him then its best to stop it. Suduko , to me if i write in this forum it means that i am willing to take view points on my face. If you dont like to take back comments on your writtings then a forum is not the right place. Also i dont see any harsh or abusive language used by CV. Its very incorrect to accuse CV as it would hurt all our sentiments as we have very high regards for him. Just one small advice, go thru SAINTS post. Take the post as constructive criticism, it will help you not only here but also in your life.

Hey its not about taking viewpoints on your comments/observations,its about owning responsibility.

We had "an 80 yr old man"giving calls on Khiday/Khoday,he has vanished just like his vanishing company.

We had analyst who wanted to be top draw in India,giving calls of being bullish when it was time to be cautious.

You know how many people have lost their shirt in the down moves,just look at volumes in the market.

I find it strange that this same person who complains abt Cartoon Network TV channel aka CNBC is giving similar crap(note for Raj Singh,i am being abusive).

Markets are such that some1 or the other will be right sometime or the other,and people remember that 1 good call over 10 bad calls.Who is the loser.Tell me.