tnsn2345,
So far I am following thread except this post. I think it is too much for my little mind to understand and on first look it says to me that the knowledge and decision making power we need to invest to make this money seems costly compare to other peer investment arena..As you mentioned in some of the above post MY comment can be deleted.
Regards
S'72, I am not clear, whether you did not understand what I was my idea on that trade or whether you think it requires lot of money to implement such idea or there are other better ideas to make more money and 'with equal amount or lesser risk or without losing money'.
If you could elaborate, we can clear our understanding.
Dear Stock72,
At least we learn how to decide or in other words the ideas shared are of high standards and reminds me hedge fund strategies.
If not today I hope one day we will have enough money to invest so let the ideas flow.
Jagan, yes if you are targeting Absoulte Alpha Returns, then you need to be constantly in the markets going long, going short quite regularly, if the amount is large then the TF becomes larger, but the position in the market is mostly likely always there, through the above Neutral Entry example you may choose to be in the market all the times, from Netural to Long, to Netural to Short, to Netural to Short and so on. I also term is as a Spiderman trades you are out of one and then into another, just like that swinging spiderman from one building to the another. Would probably write more on spiderman trades later in subsequent topics. Also related to this subject is a 'spy trade' (kindly remind me, incase I miss out to explain you this as we go further)
tnsn,
Entering neutral inspite of having a inherent bias is an eye-opener for predominantly futures traders like me with primarily trend or price action following systems.
One immediate question that comes to my mind is another of trader's itches - to do something more about the position before the review time. Your EOD trade for e.g - correctly had review periods at EOD Friday till Tuesday. Would you have tweaked something in the trade had there been a gap down in your favor on Friday morning itself and by noon, the trade was clearly deep in money? Or would the tweaking either because of loss or gain happen only at the review time, given your belief in what your system is telling for that given TF. Or are "level" based reviews better? Like a review at 5600 or at 5450 etc ..
Hope my question is clear !
Thanks,
E.
On the first part of this being an eye - opener, I would say that I developed this techinque as I found that once I had developed an opnion (essentially at the resistance or support, I would be keen to take a reversal trade, in many such occasion the trend would continue after some time and then though it seem a sure continuation of trend, since my orginal decision was reversal I would not take a position in continuation of the trend as it was not what I had anticipitated, through this techinque, since I am already in a Netural Trade, I could exit my loss making reversal trade (which was my main position) and continue holding the trend continuing position as it ran into profits.
The above techinques given large room to accomodate, right decision making errors and hence would advise it to starters, till they have developed a good strike rate sytem which gives high probablity of right signals on entry. Even today, I am stuck on lot of occasion when my system though it me some indications and I do not have conviction on that indication, I enter a Netural Trade first only to then release the loss making trade out and continue holding the profit making trade till the end of holding period.
On the second part, of reviewing the position at the end of review period, I can only tell that once you have done your trading portfolio allocation properly, (which is nothing but portfolio managment - we will discuss later) I do not see any reason for me to jump into any intermiate review. If you are thingking that the losses could be large due to gap up / gap down, that such volatility is factors in that time period portfolio and the overall effect on the total portfolio is small, even if that particular trading portfolio postion goes into a deep loss (which generally does not happen - once you have rigid and dynamic decision making trading system / method.
I recollect mentioning somewhere on this forum that I am like a baker, baking breads to cakes, to cookies in different ovens, and for different baking products, you need different temprature and time settings, I just need to open and check those ovens at those set time and not in between. As such when the timer of different oven stops as per what is being baked inside, i.e. end of my holding period, I exit automatically.
Regards,