Completed manual backtesting for almost 6 months of data, Results are looking positive. Again, there will be slightest difference when executing trades.
NT - SIGNAL NOT TRADED
here the signal candle did not take the previous candle high so its a NT.
high of BUY signal candle is not broken further.
Lets assume 20% error on below data .
Scenario - 1 - Trades without Re entry
total P = 309
total L = 124
Lets assume 20% of profitable trades are in loss. so,
total P = 247
total L = 124+67 = 191
Above data is only when the signal occured not considering Re entry. picture will change drastically while considering Re entry data. But still without Re entry i guess i have 1:1.5 RRR.
I am considering max loss per trade is 7 PTS in premium. but profit trades comes around 10-11 PTS, Lets assume 30% trades are going abv 30 PTS and more. so all in all things are looking good as per data.
NET PROFIT WITHOUT RE ENTRY = P - L.
So if there is 1 L and 1 P, for that day it is taking 0.
NET PROFIT WITHOUT RE ENTRY = 185 without 20% correction, lets take this number to 140. still its showing in positive.
Scenario - 2 - Trades with Re entry
Now, after a month i ve forgot to mention RP BIG. so i have considered it in RP.
The Rule is
RE ENTRY CAN BE INITIATED WHEN SWING HIGH OR SWING LOW BREAKS WITH MOMENTUM
Here i have found some confusion, most of the times it was only a wick of the candle below or abv the recent swing high. so the data for Re entries will have more error. But adhering to SL most of the times Re entries gave really BIG and impressive profits. lets take 30 % error for Re entries
TOTAL profitable Re entry trades = RP + RP BIG = 249 + 9 = 258 assuming 30% error comes to 78.
= 258-78 = 180.
TOTAL loss Re entry trades = 124. lets add those 30% into Re entry loss
= 124 + 78 = 202.
Here equation is looking little suspicious, I am having confusion whether to go for Re entries or not because of trades like these below.
In intial stage i am thinking to go without re entries. Any suggestion from you guys over this?