A very interesting bit and a possibly good read for traders/investors and the likes.
THIS PIECE ATTRACTED MY ATTENTION AND HENCE AM POSTING THIS FOR READERS'
BENEFIT
Sriram
My reply: Capco Institute Bulletin *[Will better forecasters surface?]*
Tom Denham, Editor, European Financial Forecast Service, Elliott Wave
International 11-Oct-2006
Will better forecasters surface as big losses wash out careless
practitioners as implied by last week's Capco Institute Bulletin:
"Forecasting must be the best job in the world - but, perhaps not for much
longer"? I do not think so, because the issue with forecasting is not the
accuracy of practitioners, but their popular appeal.
In a rational world, things would be different, but this is not a rational
world. Investing is a highly emotional business. Most people ignore
dispassionate number crunchers, and you cannot gain the title of all-star
analyst if few people listen to you.
The analysts who say what people want to hear rise to the top and
unfortunately, the crowd is bullish at peaks and bearish at bottoms. Few
people will listen to a bearish forecast at peaks. In fact, the analysts who
get attention at tops are those who make the biggest bullish claims.
Forecasters are sometimes proven to be wrong on a grand scale and yet
survive to play the game another day. The reason the market place is so
forgiving is that the forecasts that fail most spectacularly are invariably
command performances.
Crowd psychology plays two important roles in shaping forecasts. It would
take a book to completely explain how and why, but let us see how far we can
get with the next few paragraphs.
Firstly, the hopes and the fears of the crowd influence the forecaster. The
cultured myth of analysts is that they are data-driven, independent
thinkers. However, independence is not human nature. Herding or playing
follow-the-leader is human nature. The consensus view exerts as much
influence on analysts as it does on everyone else.
Secondly, the crowd gives its attention to popular views and suppresses
unpopular views by inattention. The crowd does not seek contrary opinions.
In addition, few people are willing to question their own beliefs until
contrary evidence becomes substantial. When the evidence is modest, as it
tends to be at the point of trend changes in financial markets, most people
dismiss contrary opinion and favor the opinions of people who forecast
continuation of the 'mature' trend.
The complex nature of markets also contributes to shaping crowd favorites.
It works like this: evidence sometimes begins to shift from favoring trend
continuation to trend change, but the trend remains intact. Moreover,
sometimes evidence for the likelihood of a turn in the trend builds and
builds and then evaporates as the trend continues. An implacable forecaster
who stays focused on the established trend easily looks smarter than a
careful analyst who weighs all the evidence and makes fresh judgments on a
regular basis because the careful analyst anticipates turns that never
occur. Moreover, a single-minded analyst often tells a simple story and even
smart people find that attractive.
Some conclude that it is impossible to anticipate the future and that no
forecast is worthwhile because it is all guesswork. I understand the
frustration that makes this view seem true, but I am confident that the
forecasting profession will remain intact. People want to know what other
people think and the crowd will continually elect gurus to advise them. Some
days the crowd criticizes and belittles their gurus, but they will never
stop electing gurus to guide them. And the gurus who rise to the top will be
those who support the majority view. In other words, we cannot get rid of
the 'bad' forecasters who tell us to buy at tops without changing human
nature first.
Finally, I have a confession to make. I cannot be objective about
forecasting because I am a forecaster. However, I would offer that
objectivity is a fantasy anyway. In my opinion, everyone works from a
position of bias and subjectivity, though few will admit it. In my own case,
I know that the crowd and my unique personal experiences influence my views,
whether such knowledge leads me to different views or not