Dear srivtsav,
quote::
IF THERE IS ANY MISTAKE IN MY VIEWS,PL FORGIVE AS I AM A BEGGINER.
::unquote
I beg to differ.
Thanks for your in depth study, that too in a couple of days. I will respond pointwise.
A) Point nos 8 & 9 are in opposing nature. you are right. These are only parameters for which credits are assigned either in direct proportion or inverse proportion. I should have been more careful while putting my thoughts into words. So the words "with reference to" & "to" are not to be taken in the literal sence, but as just as a pair of two values.
B) The parameter of moving averages, their changes (increase/decrease) are now considered. Presently, I am experimenting on the periods of moving averages. Convergence/Divergence of moving averages will be considered subsequently.
C) I gave negative credits inetially, but later dropped the idea. To get more/ less gradient for a particular parameter, I sometimes may use the powers. (negative number)**fraction !!!
D) For evaluating a parameter during back testing, two criteria are considered: Close/prclose for short term selections. Weighed average of high/prclse, high/low, close/prclose is being considered for intraday selections. I feel this is a fairly correlated statistical parameter. As I am yet to implement the intraday selections, you may suggest any other better criteria. As you may be aware, I am yot to start posting of intraday selections.
I thank you once again for in depth analysis of the screener paameters and for your valuable comments. I look forward to more of such responses.
murthymsr