Re: Comment on recent NFO's
The NAV of a fund does not matter. Lower navs are not cheaper. The NAV value varies based on the movement of the underlying stocks in the MF portfolio.Also these stocks in the portfolio keep changing. As long and as the fund is managed properly, the Nav "gain" should be the same.
There is a thread where I have explained in detail how an NAV is calculated. I cant find that thread though
The following are the disadvantages of a NFO
There is no record to prove that fund matches its objective
No idea of what kind of risk the fund takes
No idea about the way the fund is managed or the kind of returns it has delivered
In short, in existing funds you know if it is good fund or not where as in an NFO that is not available.
All good funds today were once NFOs but so were the bad ones. Atleast today you can say what are the good ones and what are the bad ones. This you cant do with an NFO. There have been many one hit wonders, which have soared in one year and totally diappeared in another. Whereas there have been funds that have been consistant above average performers every year. These funds also have the highest 3 yr 5 yr and 10 yr returns. It would be better going for a fund with such a track record.
Your friend was very lucky to have invested in Kotak Opputunities during NFO. It turned out to be a good fund. But that cannot be said of all other funds. I am not sure if it is ok to decide investments on the basis of luck while investing in a high risk instrument like equity.
The NAV of a fund does not matter. Lower navs are not cheaper. The NAV value varies based on the movement of the underlying stocks in the MF portfolio.Also these stocks in the portfolio keep changing. As long and as the fund is managed properly, the Nav "gain" should be the same.
There is a thread where I have explained in detail how an NAV is calculated. I cant find that thread though
The following are the disadvantages of a NFO
There is no record to prove that fund matches its objective
No idea of what kind of risk the fund takes
No idea about the way the fund is managed or the kind of returns it has delivered
In short, in existing funds you know if it is good fund or not where as in an NFO that is not available.
All good funds today were once NFOs but so were the bad ones. Atleast today you can say what are the good ones and what are the bad ones. This you cant do with an NFO. There have been many one hit wonders, which have soared in one year and totally diappeared in another. Whereas there have been funds that have been consistant above average performers every year. These funds also have the highest 3 yr 5 yr and 10 yr returns. It would be better going for a fund with such a track record.
Your friend was very lucky to have invested in Kotak Opputunities during NFO. It turned out to be a good fund. But that cannot be said of all other funds. I am not sure if it is ok to decide investments on the basis of luck while investing in a high risk instrument like equity.
Last edited: