Thanks for the answers. I ll wait for STs reply as well.
I just randomly read posts here and there and put out for discussion anything that interests me.
. Theres no intention of backtesting it. Theres so many things out here and so many coming in everyday I doubt if someone can trade or backtest everything said.
Lemondew bhai!!!
I have seen many system/s or structure in the forum...
ST da..
VWAP and Stochastics..both are based on his observation...so over the time does they work ?? it depends on market dynamics
Pratap sir,
VWAP along with SD and EMA's... in his words
I have said many times this is a framework ... not a trading system. You can combine this with whatever you are trading incorporating the bias given by this to adjust qty etc.
vwap day gives buy, sell, neutral bias zones
vwap2day gives strong positional trend zones
The timframe ema bands gives another EMA view of the trend with multiple TF bands seen on single chart
Using this framework you can create your own system, check for success rate, etc and execute. There is no single way that is right or wrong[
Even you talk Saint sir:
Note: These rules have been framed to help a beginner identify pivots. They do not cover all scenarios and there are exceptions. While marking pivots, ask yourself “Has price turned substantially?”
What all these post/s mean ??
we have to use it in your trading system the very logic if you like it and working on charts...so testing is must...for each structure or method...main focus should be on
"TWEAKING FOR YOUR NEEDS"
coming to my case : i don't use any of the methods..as it is...used pratap EMA bands for profit booking..left it after finding another way ,which is better then that...
ST da !!! one bar entry works well in case of stong trend move.. and still i follow
i define pivot in my own way.. not as Saint sir say...why in his words “Has price turned substantially?”..we have redefine that..
Adding the logic behind a setup is more important then following it in blind way..btw my system is same 30/5/1