Thanks Class. Actually SH answered my question and I got the explanation I was looking for. Coupled with your explanation of RT EOD, I think I understood the framework of this particular strategy. Thanks to both of you.
Now actually all these triggered more questions in my mind. I was trying to find answers myself before making this post. Anyways, let me share my questions.
-- First of all, how does one start to identify the stocks which may be candidate for this 315 strategy ? Do traders have a set of stocks which they keep monitoring or does one scan all the active stocks to pick the ones which may be passing the eligibility criteria for this particular strategy ?
My assumption was that the pros may be using some kind of backtesting using software to scan the hundreds of stocks and once they identify a likely victim, they monitor it closely to ensure all the indicators are suggesting to go long or short on that particular stock. However, in one of the post in this thread, SH mentioned that he does not use AFL. (It only implies he may not be using amibroker to scan the stocks) but may be I inferred too much. I wondered how does one pick a stock if he/she does not resort to mass scanning which is too tedious to do manually.
-- Second question is the timing of identification. Should one try to identify using the EOD charts the potential candidates who may pass the 315 entry rule or should one try to identify using the EOD charts the stocks already passed the 315 entry rule ? May be I got influenced by an observation in another book (Entry and Exit by Alexander Elder).
<Quote AE>
Another important role of the MA is differentiating between what I call "value trades" and "greater fool theory" trades. If you buy near the moving average, you are buying value. A person who buys well above the moving average is in effect saying --- "I'm a fool, I am overpaying, but I hope to meet a greater fool down the road".
<UNQUOTE AE>
May be this is just his perspective and what is 'near' moving average and what is 'above' is also subjective. However this triggered a thought in me. Whether to scan for stocks which already passed the 315 rule or look for stocks which in very close to 315 rule that it may pass the rule in a day or two and monitor them more closely.
Now actually all these triggered more questions in my mind. I was trying to find answers myself before making this post. Anyways, let me share my questions.
-- First of all, how does one start to identify the stocks which may be candidate for this 315 strategy ? Do traders have a set of stocks which they keep monitoring or does one scan all the active stocks to pick the ones which may be passing the eligibility criteria for this particular strategy ?
My assumption was that the pros may be using some kind of backtesting using software to scan the hundreds of stocks and once they identify a likely victim, they monitor it closely to ensure all the indicators are suggesting to go long or short on that particular stock. However, in one of the post in this thread, SH mentioned that he does not use AFL. (It only implies he may not be using amibroker to scan the stocks) but may be I inferred too much. I wondered how does one pick a stock if he/she does not resort to mass scanning which is too tedious to do manually.
-- Second question is the timing of identification. Should one try to identify using the EOD charts the potential candidates who may pass the 315 entry rule or should one try to identify using the EOD charts the stocks already passed the 315 entry rule ? May be I got influenced by an observation in another book (Entry and Exit by Alexander Elder).
<Quote AE>
Another important role of the MA is differentiating between what I call "value trades" and "greater fool theory" trades. If you buy near the moving average, you are buying value. A person who buys well above the moving average is in effect saying --- "I'm a fool, I am overpaying, but I hope to meet a greater fool down the road".
<UNQUOTE AE>
May be this is just his perspective and what is 'near' moving average and what is 'above' is also subjective. However this triggered a thought in me. Whether to scan for stocks which already passed the 315 rule or look for stocks which in very close to 315 rule that it may pass the rule in a day or two and monitor them more closely.