Simple Coding Help - No Promise.

[Giraffe]

I am using Automatic Analysis to scan market for moving average crossovers and want to display an additional column displaying Highest Value of Close in past 50 bars. The code I am trying is given below. But I am not getting the additional column "High". I am trying in Ami 5.60.2 and used both Old and New Auto Analysis, but not getting the additional column in any of it.

Buy = Cross( MA(Close, 15 ) , MA(Close, 75 ));

Sell = Cross( MA(Close, 75 ) , MA(Close, 15 ));

AddColumn(HHV(Close,50), "High");

Can't figure out what I am doing wrong...

 

[KelvinHand]

................................................................

 

[KelvinHand]

I am using Automatic Analysis to scan market for moving average crossovers and want to display an additional column displaying Highest Value of Close in past 50 bars. The code I am trying is given below. But I am not getting the additional column "High". I am trying in Ami 5.60.2 and used both Old and New Auto Analysis, but not getting the additional column in any of it.

Buy = Cross( MA(Close, 15 ) , MA(Close, 75 ));

Sell = Cross( MA(Close, 75 ) , MA(Close, 15 ));

AddColumn(HHV(Close,50), "High");

Can't figure out what I am doing wrong...

When you face problem, learn to look into the self guide.
http://www.amibroker.com/guide/h_exploration.html


Without Filter, how the Exploration know what you want
Put
Filter = Buy or Sell;
Before AddColumn

 

[Giraffe]

When you face problem, learn to look into the self guide.
http://www.amibroker.com/guide/h_exploration.html


Without Filter, how the Exploration know what you want
Put
Filter = Buy or Sell;
Before AddColumn

Thanks Kelvin

I already tried with Filter also, but the result is same with/without Filter.

Even with filter I am getting the same list without the additional column.

Here is the screenshot.....

 

[KelvinHand]

Thanks Kelvin

I already tried with Filter also, but the result is same with/without Filter.

Even with filter I am getting the same list without the additional column.

Here is the screenshot.....

Too small. Cannot see your image

 

[Giraffe]

Too small. Cannot see your image

OK, reuploading
But its getting small on posting, become OK by clicking on the bar above "This image has been resized, Click the bar to view full image."

The direct link is:
http://s21.postimg.org/wz94ere1j/imgjpg.jpg

[/url]

 

[KelvinHand]

OK, reuploading
But its getting small on posting, become OK by clicking on the bar above "This image has been resized, Click the bar to view full image."

The direct link is:
http://s21.postimg.org/wz94ere1j/imgjpg.jpg

[/url]

Why you press the scan button ? Press "Exploration", Apply to "Filter"
Scan is fixed. When you do a scan, it will always show "Symbols, Trade, Date Close"

Only Exploration can custom what you want.


Very strange, most people got the itch hand will touch anything cause of curiosity
But you are not

 

[Giraffe]

Why you press the scan button ? Press "Exploration", Apply to "Filter"
Scan is fixed. When you do a scan, it will always show "Symbols, Trade, Date Close"

Only Exploration can custom what you want.


Very strange, most people got the itch hand will touch anything cause of curiosity
But you are not

:rofl::rofl::rofl:

Oooooopssssssss..........heheeheeeee.....
It worked.......:thumb::thumb:
Thanks a lot......:clapping::clapping:

 

[bharatk8]

This code for RSI divergence seems to have some issue.Pl. correct it.

RBP = ( ( RSI( 9 ) >= HHV( RSI( 9 ), 9 ) ) AND ( Close < HHV( Close, 9 ) ) ) OR ( ( Close <= LLV( Close, 9 ) ) AND ( RSI( 9 ) > LLV( RSI( 9 ), 9 ) ) );
//RSI -ve
RBN = ( ( RSI( 9 ) <= LLV( RSI( 9 ), 9 ) ) AND ( Close > LLV( Close, 9 ) ) ) OR ( ( Close >= HHV( Close, 9 ) ) AND ( RSI( 9 ) < HHV( RSI( 9 ), 9 ) ) );

 

[pratapvb]

This code for RSI divergence seems to have some issue.Pl. correct it.

RBP = ( ( RSI( 9 ) >= HHV( RSI( 9 ), 9 ) ) AND ( Close < HHV( Close, 9 ) ) ) OR ( ( Close <= LLV( Close, 9 ) ) AND ( RSI( 9 ) > LLV( RSI( 9 ), 9 ) ) );
//RSI -ve
RBN = ( ( RSI( 9 ) <= LLV( RSI( 9 ), 9 ) ) AND ( Close > LLV( Close, 9 ) ) ) OR ( ( Close >= HHV( Close, 9 ) ) AND ( RSI( 9 ) < HHV( RSI( 9 ), 9 ) ) );

code seems ok subject to
1. It is not comparing corresponding close...that is the HHV close maybe on a diff bar from HHV of RSI. But I don't think this should be a big issue.

2. more importantly, is the fact that it will detect only RSI divergences that happen within 9 bars