Stocks To Keep A Close Eye On
- Thread starter SavantGarde
- Start date
- Tags afl amibroker
- Status
Goofy Bro,
If it makes you feel any better, in my case, you will have to shift the decimal point a bit after changing the numbers
.
No complaints though, the hunt has always been interesting when I have worked on it. I have got lost several times not knowing where to go whenever I have lost focus and, sometimes I have allowed myself to be simply swept by the tide. The learning continues.
The smallest salmon that you catch tastes better than the costliest fish you can buy. The interest is in the hunt not in the feast, when this is not my primary vocation.
Added later - No excuses though - this does not detract from the fact that you have to always do the best you can or you quit if it does not interest you any more and you have other options anyway.
If it makes you feel any better, in my case, you will have to shift the decimal point a bit after changing the numbers
.No complaints though, the hunt has always been interesting when I have worked on it. I have got lost several times not knowing where to go whenever I have lost focus and, sometimes I have allowed myself to be simply swept by the tide. The learning continues.
The smallest salmon that you catch tastes better than the costliest fish you can buy. The interest is in the hunt not in the feast, when this is not my primary vocation.
Added later - No excuses though - this does not detract from the fact that you have to always do the best you can or you quit if it does not interest you any more and you have other options anyway.
I hear you, Sir.
It is amazing that you, and other loving TJ members are comforting me.
My sincere thanks.
But would you believe, I tried to do the same to my good friend, Gauhar, by showing my money-leaking portfolio! So as to make him feel fine before he left for his hometown!
Goofy might get pushed to the ropes occasionly, but never goes out of the ring. Bring on the other round!
Hmmm...MT,
If your losses are plotted as candlestick... looking at the decreasing body of the candlestick.... you are done for now... & will breakout on the upside after a little consolidation with positive bias....
SavantGarde
If your losses are plotted as candlestick... looking at the decreasing body of the candlestick.... you are done for now... & will breakout on the upside after a little consolidation with positive bias....
SavantGarde
Wait is over Guys,... Pappu fir fail ho gaya..........the only consolation is this months Loss is lowest out of all 10 months...less than 1500..(commited less mistakes). highest loss was in March (35K)...Today could not ride Nifty Run @ 12 onwards due to ODIN problems..data update stopped three times ...otherwise 2K is acheivable easily in that trade .. ...So move on to December....woh subah kabhi toh aayegi
........the only consolation is this months Loss is lowest out of all 10 months...less than 1500..(commited less mistakes). highest loss was in March (35K)...Today could not ride Nifty Run @ 12 onwards due to ODIN problems..data update stopped three times ...otherwise 2K is acheivable easily in that trade .. ...So move on to December....woh subah kabhi toh aayegi
Playing poker teaches you how to know how you treat profits and your way of approaching trades including probability esp at the beginning when no cards are shown.
I have seen that inexperienced players may strike it big but almost always leave the table after losing their windfall to another patient vulture.
The first hand after the windfall is almost always reckless and a guaranteed loss. (similar in trading where we need to protect our gains as opposed to our tendency to get over confident)
Even here there are adds (called raise) which yields more than one shot bets.
Also that some hands are almost always worth the risk. (analogous to identifying a strong trend).
The number of players and the resulting change in dynamics is the same as effect of volumes in trading.
Another thing is the last one to play the hand is at an advantage as long as he has a larger capital base and vice versa i.e with a smaller capital can enter earlier but lower RRR.
I have seen that inexperienced players may strike it big but almost always leave the table after losing their windfall to another patient vulture.
The first hand after the windfall is almost always reckless and a guaranteed loss. (similar in trading where we need to protect our gains as opposed to our tendency to get over confident)
Even here there are adds (called raise) which yields more than one shot bets.
Also that some hands are almost always worth the risk. (analogous to identifying a strong trend).
The number of players and the resulting change in dynamics is the same as effect of volumes in trading.
Another thing is the last one to play the hand is at an advantage as long as he has a larger capital base and vice versa i.e with a smaller capital can enter earlier but lower RRR.
Hmmm...MT,
If your losses are plotted as candlestick... looking at the decreasing body of the candlestick.... you are done for now... & will breakout on the upside after a little consolidation with positive bias....
SavantGarde
If your losses are plotted as candlestick... looking at the decreasing body of the candlestick.... you are done for now... & will breakout on the upside after a little consolidation with positive bias....
SavantGarde
.. like me can certainly improve..
*Interesting things you didn't know about the Chairman:
WASHINGTON– Amid a discussion of trade in 1973, Chinese leader Mao Zedong made what U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger called a novel proposition: sending tens of thousands, even 10 million, Chinese women to the United States.
“You know, China is a very poor country,” Mao said, according to a document released by the State Department’s historian office.
“We don’t have much. What we have in excess is women. So if you want them we can give a few of those to you, some tens of thousands.”
A few minutes later, Mao circled back to the offer. “Do you want our Chinese women?” he asked. “We can give you 10 million.”
After Kissinger noted Mao was “improving his offer,” the chairman said, “We have too many women. … They give birth to children and our children are too many.”
“It is such a novel proposition,” Kissinger replied in his discussion with Mao in Beijing. “We will have to study it.”
WASHINGTON– Amid a discussion of trade in 1973, Chinese leader Mao Zedong made what U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger called a novel proposition: sending tens of thousands, even 10 million, Chinese women to the United States.
“You know, China is a very poor country,” Mao said, according to a document released by the State Department’s historian office.
“We don’t have much. What we have in excess is women. So if you want them we can give a few of those to you, some tens of thousands.”
A few minutes later, Mao circled back to the offer. “Do you want our Chinese women?” he asked. “We can give you 10 million.”
After Kissinger noted Mao was “improving his offer,” the chairman said, “We have too many women. … They give birth to children and our children are too many.”
“It is such a novel proposition,” Kissinger replied in his discussion with Mao in Beijing. “We will have to study it.”
Last edited by a moderator:
- Status
Similar threads
-
to keep record of stocks i will be following- Started by Gandhar.
- Replies: 5
-
-
-
-
Is it ok to buy Stocks keeping the current market scenarios in mind or should I wait
- Started by greg4u
- Replies: 10