Stocks To Keep A Close Eye On

[Prashant Patel]

Savantji,
One more thing...
holding SJVN 800 avg @ 24/-
now nothing happening to ME.

 

[savkar]

150 lots of SBI would cost 150 X 125 X 100 = around 18 Lakhs. as it was under SG's name i was whole heartedly believing it

Sorry for the mistake. It was indeed 125 i.e 1 lot of SBI.

 

[savkar]

SBIN - 1 K loss still holding
TATAMOT - 2K loss holding
made 1.5K profit in nifty put

Bought 5 more lots.
it tanked ... so sold 2 lots .. so loss of around 5K ..

holding on with 3 lots ... will now hold till decent profit

edit: bought 1 OPT-STABAN-30-Dec-2010-3100-CA @ 118

 

[Sunny1]

I am so so glad...your feet is firmly grounded on earth.... Guys... here is an example of how to be realistic & pragmatic....and take things a little slow...

Yes I have promised a detailed explanation... will do it as soon as I am able to collate everything and able to express myself coherently....so that I am not mistaken for a mad lunatic.....babbling away on a full moon day....which is normal for me....

Please have some patience while I think about how to go about it...

SavantGarde

SG, Please take your time for full and detailed explanation.:thumb:. I know its difficult to explain PA. Also open another thread to discuss pure and simple PA.

I had one trade with PA with tata steel last year thought not the scalping one .. but continuous tracking tata steel watching price all the time..I remember how it formed chart like in memory with s/r ...

 

[savkar]

Have you compared RKG with others. How do you find it in terms of ease of use, tie up with banks, speed, software usability ? your inputs will be v helpful

I too use RKG.

 

[DanPickUp]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

[SavantGarde]

Dan,

Don't try this stunts here... if you don't understand English I suggest you go & study the language first....

You want Learn TA & Charts....come over bring your Best TA & I will still have something to teach....

When you don't understand what is being discussed stay out of the topic....
When I am discussing TA you may want to come then....

....and Don't make stupid statements that I said TA is nonsense... read the whole thread properly before you start looking more foolish than you have already shown us here...

SavantGarde

For all of your clever people which think, that TA is nonsense, because SG says it :

 

[talisman]

Couldnt have said it any better! It's also called simplifying your thought process. But, the actual problem is with people who think, unless and until you dont use complicated words or jargon, money-making is not going to be easy in context of trading. It's very much like those who study metaphysics claim the right to be termed intelligent and intellectual whereas those who go through concept of nihilism or mere history pages are assumed to be dormant and dull. If what you explained here in simplest of words cant get through heads of cynics, nothing else can!

Thanks, Mr. Sinchan, for this thoughtful post.

What is interesting indeed, is the fact that we are taking this SG's method vs. Dan's contention rather too far.

Allow me please to think aloud:
In your post you yourself say, that because his superior memory SG can do without charts etc. What logically follows from this statement is, that the people with superior memory would not require charts etc to successfully trade, but less 'fortunates' definitely would.

Then where is the conflict. The matter is settled. End of discussion!

But that is not to be.

Reason is: we all habitually want to bridge any two contradictory statements. And we invariably fail, and the we invariably try again to do what we failed in. And the cycle goes on and on... Some call it discussion, some call it debate. Most of the times it is stupidity, pure and simple.

Fact. None of us likea to be considered a lesser human. Even all the the supporting evidence come in person and shakes our hand, still we'd refuse to acknowledge its existance. And go on adding 2+2, expecting 5 would come out eventually after N number of trials.

Fact. He may say anything, but SG doesn't know why he requires no charts. As Mozart didn't know why all the divine music came to him. As Einstein didn't know why he was the one to think up Relativity.

These sort people are called Mavericks.

And no IIT or MIT or Harvard is currently running 'How to be Maverick' Graduation Degree Course.

Accept the facts. Find what works for you. And get on with life. That is my experience, brother. And being a human I can be entirely wrong in my views.

 

[sadiq]

In case If we are going in some sort of row among ourself then there is a well know law in traderji . That is to use "Right to Ignore "
regards

 

[talisman]

...............