Useful Tools

[chintan786]

thanks for ur feedback swagat... i recently get this .. now onwards i keep this in mind....

 

[swagat86]

thanks for ur feedback swagat... i recently get this .. now onwards i keep this in mind....

Sure, but dont forget to keep trying. i mean if it may not work for me. It doesnt mean it wont work on u.

Best of luck.

 

[chintan786]

This sw is gr8. switch it on a few days and ul c all previous counts missin and new counts marked.

Wheni got thru this sw i thought iv got the holy grail. Soon realised its a piece of crap.

njoy

Now frm Get... I don't have AlphOmega... otherwise will try MS also..

 

[MAGNET MAN]

dear chintan

dear chintan,

in my view counting and identification in chart is wrong.

what i feel its like that:

3617 to 4215 (first wave)
4215 to 3988 (second wave)
3988 to 4365 (third wave)
4365 to 4100 (forth wave)
4100 to 4647 ( fifth wave)

4647 to 4267 (a corrective)
4267 to 4531 (b technical rally)
4531 to ...............( on going c corrective)

its just my view

warm regards
magnet man

 

[chintan786]

Re: dear chintan

dear chintan,

in my view counting and identification in chart is wrong.

what i feel its like that:

3617 to 4215 (first wave)
4215 to 3988 (second wave)
3988 to 4365 (third wave)
4365 to 4100 (forth wave)
4100 to 4647 ( fifth wave)

4647 to 4267 (a corrective)
4267 to 4531 (b technical rally)
4531 to ...............( on going c corrective)

its just my view

warm regards
magnet man

Hi Magnet man , I get this chart frm Get ..... it is direct software anslysis.

anything wrong is only possible if there is some mistake in data or software itself.

As far data is concerned it is pure for sure.

I want to know on which basis u are giving abv levels..

If it is done by some study on charts then plz post the chart also.

so tht I can correct my mistake...

thanks for feedback

chintan

 

[MAGNET MAN]

as u said that its software analysis,

in my view that software dosen't catch the little bit manupulation in mkt.(i am saying because i have expirienced it).

like in chart it was visible that first wave started from 3515, but ithink no.
its not true.

as i said its my view based on my analysis style, i may be wrong also
but i strongly think that i am write.
and about chart i dont use that for elliot,
i use charts only for volumes.

warm regards
magnet man

 

[swagat86]

hi chintan u can search for Alpha omega at 4shared. ul get another set of counts.

thanks

 

[chintan786]

hi chintan u can search for Alpha omega at 4shared. ul get another set of counts.

thanks

thanks Swagat, But if I get different counts with AlphaOmega then water get muddied only...then we not get wht we are looking for..

Also how u see the chrts provided by me frm GET....Right or wrong..


thanks

 

[amitt29]

They are all wrong.Including the manual count provided by magnet(wave 3 shortest there).So obviously according to that we finished wave 4 of 3 at yesterdays low.With wave 5 of 3 in progress which can end at 4700 levels and finishing wave 3 fom 3988.

But such huge retracement makes me wonder.

 

[chintan786]

Ab aur sono ..... then wht u are using to get wave count... and how much I correct...

and also WHT IS CORRECT WAVE COUNT.