Hello Jain bro,
Previously I was actually facing this issue when I was choosing an entry location and keeping a stop at 8-12 points below the entry level. Most of the time my stop was getting hit and after that market was moving in the desired direction. It was then I realised and asked my self why I am keeping a stop of 12 points ? Why not a stop loss of 25 points. The answer was 25 point stop was way out of my risk taking capability on a single trade. Then the next question was even If i can afford a risk of 25 points stop on a single trade, Is that any guarantee that it wont get hit ??
So the first requirement of stop placing came as it should be chosen as the level, which when hit will invalidate your trade premises. Lets say I am anticipating a breakout pullback setup long setup. So let the bears show what all they have got. And my stop will be below that point and if price will reach the stop level, then It should invalidate my long setup, and no more I will be looking for a breakout pullback long trade.
Therefore now my approach is determine the initial stop level, choose an suitable entry close to stop (minimize the risk), Once entry triggered manage the trade actively rather than choosing an entry first and keeping a stop below 10-15 points below that.
Sometimes after the stop region is defined, I don't find a proper entry level/pattern, and I have to let the price go, as the trade setup does not favour my risk reward ratio. for example yesterday after 1PM i did not find a trade favouring my risk reward ratio, so no trades were done after 1 pm.
Lastly, whenever a stop is getting hit it means either we have an early entry, or our trade premises is an invalid one. So we must look deeper in to our trade analysis method If price is moving in our expected way or not. And stop loss is a risk management exit, and is there to minimize the loss and keep us alive in the game. So it should be welcomed.
Regards
Taiki
Previously I was actually facing this issue when I was choosing an entry location and keeping a stop at 8-12 points below the entry level. Most of the time my stop was getting hit and after that market was moving in the desired direction. It was then I realised and asked my self why I am keeping a stop of 12 points ? Why not a stop loss of 25 points. The answer was 25 point stop was way out of my risk taking capability on a single trade. Then the next question was even If i can afford a risk of 25 points stop on a single trade, Is that any guarantee that it wont get hit ??
So the first requirement of stop placing came as it should be chosen as the level, which when hit will invalidate your trade premises. Lets say I am anticipating a breakout pullback setup long setup. So let the bears show what all they have got. And my stop will be below that point and if price will reach the stop level, then It should invalidate my long setup, and no more I will be looking for a breakout pullback long trade.
Therefore now my approach is determine the initial stop level, choose an suitable entry close to stop (minimize the risk), Once entry triggered manage the trade actively rather than choosing an entry first and keeping a stop below 10-15 points below that.
Sometimes after the stop region is defined, I don't find a proper entry level/pattern, and I have to let the price go, as the trade setup does not favour my risk reward ratio. for example yesterday after 1PM i did not find a trade favouring my risk reward ratio, so no trades were done after 1 pm.
Lastly, whenever a stop is getting hit it means either we have an early entry, or our trade premises is an invalid one. So we must look deeper in to our trade analysis method If price is moving in our expected way or not. And stop loss is a risk management exit, and is there to minimize the loss and keep us alive in the game. So it should be welcomed.
Regards
Taiki