Day Traders Lounge.

sadiq

Active Member
Who says, it wont last long.
This ban will prove a milking buffalo to everyone in power there. :lol: :lol:
it is good to have illegal liquor than legalized one .. as only the compulsory drinkers will drink .. others will avoid it ..
 

cloudTrader

Well-Known Member
Right and wrong should be decided on the merit of the action and not whoz doing it and what they did earlier. If it seems to be good for the country i will support it irrespective of whoz bringing it like the recent decision by bihar govn to ban liquor.
Thats what I am saying. If UPA was wrong , one voted NDA for the change. That time the merit of the decisions was in question by NDA itself. Now if that wrong has become right then has that person's vote gone waste or a person should think that at that time the merit was something else but with time the merit has changed?

Over 300 projects of UPA govt. which were then pending due to NDA's vehement opposition as these projects were against the people of the country at that time have been taken into custody by PMO for relaunching in toto one by one , just with slight name changes. Merits were same that time too but opposed.

I am not supporting any regime but you said about merit so I gave a thought about the validity of merit when regime changes.
 
Thats what I am saying. If UPA was wrong , one voted NDA for the change. That time the merit of the decisions was in question by NDA itself. Now if that wrong has become right then has that person's vote gone waste or a person should think that at that time the merit was something else but with time the merit has changed?

Over 300 projects of UPA govt. which were then pending due to NDA's vehement opposition as these projects were against the people of the country at that time have been taken into custody by PMO for relaunching in toto one by one , just with slight name changes. Merits were same that time too but opposed.

I am not supporting any regime but you said about merit so I gave a thought about the validity of merit when regime changes.
I think it was UPA which was in majority in both the houses unlike this time where NDA has majority only in lok sabha, so even if BJp opposed they should have been able to implement those projects but they failed and that was the real issue along with corruption.
Not every decision taken by UPA was bad and not every decision taken by NDA will be good so decide on what you think will be good for the country regardless of what policies a party supported in the past.
 

cloudTrader

Well-Known Member
I think it was UPA which was in majority in both the houses unlike this time where NDA has majority only in lok sabha, so even if BJp opposed they should have been able to implement those projects but they failed and that was the real issue along with corruption.
Not every decision taken by UPA was bad and not every decision taken by NDA will be good so decide on what you think will be good for the country regardless of what policies a party supported in the past.
Currently as the topic was going in direction of the Excise duty imposed on Jewelers, would just like to add that at that time when UPA brought this proposal Arun Jaitley said that this decision will only lead to corruption as it facilitates Inspector Raj. More checks will be mandated and the tax collection will get hampered. The jewelers will be in much better position when they pay Tax equivalent to the Excise duty imposition.

Jewelers on the other hand as of now are ready to pay Tax without any objections. They just want that the unnecessary paper work should be done away with.

This is just like the case of us traders when we trade in Options and make a turnover of Rs. 1 crore and profit less than 8% then we have to undergo compulsorily for Audit of our Books inspite of knowing that turnover in Options is being calculated adding the Sell Value of Options wherein it does not make a part in the profit. So we as traders face unnecessary paper work and futile charges go to CA. For this only Zerodha opened a petition on Change.org last year requesting Arun Jaitley to do away with this but in vain. We were unheard by the FM.
 

vijayanscbe

Well-Known Member
Vertigo,

This was same Mr. Modi Ji who vehemently opposed the same proposal from UPA govt. The jewelers went on strike at that time and the decision was rolled back by the UPA govt. in 22 days.

Why suddenly the same proposal seems to be in the right direction by the people who were standing strong with Jewellers in the past?

I am confused that what UPA was doing was right or what NDA is repeating is wrong ? :confused: :confused:
Recently I read the honest statement of a politician (ela.ganesan-BJP) in TN.
A reporter asked, opposite parties are giving negative reviews about Budget, what is your opinion? He said " If the ruling party is going to release budget on monday means , its opposition party's duty to prepare negative statement by sunday evening itself. This is what we have done in past , so dont take negative statements seriously" :lol: :lol: :lol:
 

cloudTrader

Well-Known Member
Recently I read the honest statement of a politician (ela.ganesan-BJP) in TN.
A reporter asked, opposite parties are giving negative reviews about Budget, what is your opinion? He said " If the ruling party is going to release budget on monday means , its opposition party's duty to prepare negative statement by sunday evening itself. This is what we have done in past , so dont take negative statements seriously" :lol: :lol: :lol:
The irony of our country is that what should be taken seriously is rebuked and what is meant to be rebuked is taken most seriously.. :(
 
Bhai, why confused, no confusion.

All of these political parties are hypocrite. They will give a lecture on something and when its time to follow themselves, they will either close their eyes or follow the opposite/other way themselves or will choose selectively.

And why blame political parties alone. You can find such hypocrites in all walks of like, every where, even this forum is no exception. One can find many such fellows here as well. :mad:
Dekha, what did I say. Hypocrites here also.
They cant dare bash a senior member :mad: :lol:
Their whip is only for new or relatively new members
 
The irony of our country is that what should be taken seriously is rebuked and what is meant to be rebuked is taken most seriously.. :(
No my friend. They rebuke only mango public, all rules and laws are applicable for mango people, otherwise they do not have words for opposite party (they keep mum, if they know that the opposite party is stronger than them) or they rebuke/fight only for showoff.