(Though this post is in response to VVVV 's post it is not addressed to him alone!!!)
Thanks a lot for a detailed explanation!!! Please do not treat this post as if I want to argue....I wish to make the system as less dependent on my personal views as possible!!!
Vikram, I know that i will get an earlier signal in 30 minutes. My effort is to remove the "I" from my decisions!!! And also to keep the system simple!!! Now the first question comes :
How much profit is good profit!!!
How far a SL is "far off"!!!
Thanks a lot for a detailed explanation!!! Please do not treat this post as if I want to argue....I wish to make the system as less dependent on my personal views as possible!!!
Vikram, I know that i will get an earlier signal in 30 minutes. My effort is to remove the "I" from my decisions!!! And also to keep the system simple!!! Now the first question comes :
How much profit is good profit!!!
How far a SL is "far off"!!!
In both the situations I have to decide which I wish to dispense with. So the easiest way out of avoiding the use of "I" here is to be with the flow!!!
But the rules suggested by Saint recommend that we use a 30 min. chart for reversal if this or this is the situation!!
Vikram I am still not been able to fully comprehend the exact "B]this or this [/B]" situation recommended by Saint!!! As i mentioned in my earlier post, the matter is not vague but also not crystal clear!!! Saint has done his best to explain it N number of times, seems I am unable to shed my preconceived notions so not entering my thick head!!! Seems I have some "unlearning" to do!!!!
But the rules suggested by Saint recommend that we use a 30 min. chart for reversal if this or this is the situation!!
Vikram I am still not been able to fully comprehend the exact "B]this or this [/B]" situation recommended by Saint!!! As i mentioned in my earlier post, the matter is not vague but also not crystal clear!!! Saint has done his best to explain it N number of times, seems I am unable to shed my preconceived notions so not entering my thick head!!! Seems I have some "unlearning" to do!!!!
It is done so that a great mind like yours,RK,does not need to "unlearn" anything.......you are already seeing the Pure Flow crystal clear.Follow that strategy consistently to great profits.Finally,the greater your profits are is dependant on how much you enter with and your adds......the Pure Flow Traders,by their patience,and serenity,will be able to consistently blast through the Roof,and make great wealth.
So,please do not try to change...........there is the other more aggressive group,but that doesn't mean you have to change strategy........that chart that you posted shows a Perfect Pure Trade,and as mentioned before,a fantastic trade............very proud,very very proud,although you are much older than I am.
So what do I do, as mentioned by you , I decide on the tweaks and trade them!!! But still my inclination is to understand the "rules" as set by Saint and the reason for this being, very frankly, the rules derived by Saint, who has a trading experience of the System of around more than a couple of years, and mine is just around 2 months!!! Why would I not wish to use something much better than mine!!!
I am happy that I earned in last 2 months of trades but there always remained an iota of doubt about the trades being done though I had back tested for more than 15 months with not a single derivative month giving loss. To be candid the profits analysed or even in real trades profits earned were no where near what Saint had achieved, but would hasten to add : "Profits were handsome by any standards, to say the least."
Question is then why do I need to seek guidance for the adds or this 30 min. Pivot etc. etc. Every system has its drawdowns, this shall also have its , may be small may be big, time shall tell!!! But to counter the drawdowns one must extract the 'full value' of the system. After all when a system is traded one looks at the no. of winners , loosers, size if wins, size of losses etc. If I win big loose small so far so good!! But if I win small and loose small or win big and loose big the R/R ratio is tossed out of proportion in the long run!!! And I am convinced that my tweaks though working fine have not been able to achieve what was desired!!!! Testing time would come when the market turns sideways!!!! I may still earn but net net but with adverse R/R ratio!!!
No offence was meant or intended!!!! If any I apologise!!!
All the best!!!
R K Karnani
I am happy that I earned in last 2 months of trades but there always remained an iota of doubt about the trades being done though I had back tested for more than 15 months with not a single derivative month giving loss. To be candid the profits analysed or even in real trades profits earned were no where near what Saint had achieved, but would hasten to add : "Profits were handsome by any standards, to say the least."
Question is then why do I need to seek guidance for the adds or this 30 min. Pivot etc. etc. Every system has its drawdowns, this shall also have its , may be small may be big, time shall tell!!! But to counter the drawdowns one must extract the 'full value' of the system. After all when a system is traded one looks at the no. of winners , loosers, size if wins, size of losses etc. If I win big loose small so far so good!! But if I win small and loose small or win big and loose big the R/R ratio is tossed out of proportion in the long run!!! And I am convinced that my tweaks though working fine have not been able to achieve what was desired!!!! Testing time would come when the market turns sideways!!!! I may still earn but net net but with adverse R/R ratio!!!
No offence was meant or intended!!!! If any I apologise!!!
All the best!!!
R K Karnani
As always,great post from yourself.
Thanks,
Saint