Saint,
Went through the gap rules and examples...the logic is well understood. However, also found out that the criteria does not meet often to qualify for the Gap-reverse rules.I was also working on the Gap scenarios....and found an interesting pattern.
Keeping up with your philosophy of keeping the things simple... and at the same time getting the reversals at the best risk/reward ratios, I have worked out the following rules:
1. We apply the Gap-reverse rule irrespective of markets making any HH/HL pattern. We apply the rule when the market opens above or below the market range made during the last 2-3 days. Meaning if markets opens above the high of last 3 days or below the low of last 3 days we apply the Gap-reverse rule.
2. We go Long above /Short below the high/low of the first 5 min candle...if it meets our criterion with a filter of 20 points.
3. Thats it....
Great effort Rakesh,
I have some interesting observation to share with you and others. I took NIFTY data from sep 30 till Nov 11 2008 and did back test twice
1. NIFTY using just pivots
2. NIFTY using pivots with gap rules.
Results are not much different, this is a smaller set of data and planning to extend this for atleast an year.
Just Pivots no gap Rules:
Total no of trades 11
Winning trades 7 Losing 4
Total points made 2447 (or 122350 Rs)
With Gap and Pivots: (considered all gaps)
Total no of trades 16
Winning trades 8 Losing 8
Total points made 2437 (or 121850 Rs)
When we are using gap rules we are killing some big winners but interestingly i didn't see any difference in final output.
I'm not suggesting anything to anyone, just sharing my observations. Comments or criticism all welcome