Pattel,
What is better and what is not, is not the question here. That will come later. People are welcome to back test and see what is best. But I am speaking purely from interpretation point of view. We have still to grasp the full picture of this method. If you people have already done so and see what I have said in my posts above then I must say that I am a laggard and am slow to see things
.
You see everything meshes beautifully. 2 bar rule in a sharp upthrust shows shades of fibonacci retracement principle ( in aggressive strategy, we are not giving it room to retrace and resume its onward journey. If you are that aggressive then try and capture the retracement points which you are not doing, so you are loosing both ways, isn't it) and prices ruling three hours back makes a case for 3 hours EMA juxtaposed on a higher EMA (which higher EMA also is a matter of further research which is my area of interest but does not fit into this thread). I am not going colour this method with my ideas and would leave it to be driven in its pristine and pure form of Saint's original ideas.
I do not very clearly recall the exact nature of your posts which you said were later deleted which is a pity. All thoughts should be there for all to explore and examine and then move on. That is the very idea of this forum.
Individual trades and accounts are very private in nature but ideas if kept private will never grow.
Keep posting friends. Good forum for excellent discussions!!!!
Bee