Price movements in the same direction?

[SavantGarde]

Confussion is of the nature of filter for the Time Seies & whether Spatial Fourier transform or Discrete Time fourier transform ? The Practical fraction expansion or Brownian fractral geometry ? The stability of a Finite Difference scheme ? (Time can it be ignored as a dimension in Future apart from Price)
The presence of 'Smart Money' (in billion dollars yaar) compels me to take recourse of Game theory.

Hi Ashish,

I have just attached a text file at "Nifty Intraday Pivot Points.
Have A Look at it.......It might be of Interest to You.

Happy & Safe Trading

SavantGarde

 

[kkseal]

One Can Never Tell Which Way The Train Will Go By Looking At The Track.

Even if one gets to see the train which way it'll go is relative depending on which side of the track you are; which side of the track you are is relative to from where you are being viewed; from where you are being viewed is relative to the position of the observer on the earth's surface; the position on the earth's surface is relative to the earth's rotation & revolution; the movement of the earth is relative to .....

This is the problem yaar with non-stationary reference frames.

Regards,
Kalyan.

 

[SavantGarde]

A famous statistician would never travel by airplane, because he had studied air travel and estimated the probability of there being a bomb on any given flight was 1 in a million, and he was not prepared to accept these odds. One day a colleague met him at a conference far from home.

"How did you get here, by train?"

"No, I flew"

"What about your possibiltiy of a bomb?"

"Well, I began thinking that if the odds of one bomb are 1:million, then the odds of TWO bombs are (1/1,000,000) x (1/1,000,000). This is a very, very small probability, which I can accept. So, now I bring my own bomb along!"

Happy & Safe Trading

SavantGarde

 

[Saint]

A famous statistician would never travel by airplane, because he had studied air travel and estimated the probability of there being a bomb on any given flight was 1 in a million, and he was not prepared to accept these odds. One day a colleague met him at a conference far from home.

"How did you get here, by train?"

"No, I flew"

"What about your possibiltiy of a bomb?"

"Well, I began thinking that if the odds of one bomb are 1:million, then the odds of TWO bombs are (1/1,000,000) x (1/1,000,000). This is a very, very small probability, which I can accept. So, now I bring my own bomb along!"

Happy & Safe Trading

SavantGarde

lol ...Savant,enjoy your posts,keep em coming!

Saint

 

[uasish]

Even if one gets to see the train which way it'll go is relative depending on which side of the track you are; which side of the track you are is relative to from where you are being viewed; from where you are being viewed is relative to the position of the observer on the earth's surface; the position on the earth's surface is relative to the earth's rotation & revolution; the movement of the earth is relative to .....

This is the problem yaar with non-stationary reference frames.

Regards,
Kalyan.

It is STATIONARY in relative to NOW ,'Photo Finish logic for horse racing' ,all probabilities for NEXT & its discrete finite change of state ,the probable change can be projected in the 'Set' (probability set theory).
Reference points ? dont we look in today (on mkt live whether > yesterday's H ,that is the immediate Res ),is'nt it not a reference ?
The logic of non-stationary or continuous price discovery,eternally can go on this Bid/Ask, ACCEPTED ,but you/i being stationary in the train's track cant say which direction the train will go ,is what ? two possibility
Same
Opposite
Same from what reference point ,Previuos State
Opposite to what reference point ,Previuos State
So now dont we have a reference here ?
Hence it's ,the State's ,change & its probable path can be mathametically calculated.
Your logic for every thing being relative is accepted ,hence TIME (the Y axis in chart).
Relative to time so my analogy :=
..... stability of a finite difference scheme (FDS). It only consider FDSs having one time dimension, but any number of spatial dimensions.
Thks kalyan you are helping me for my development.

 

[SavantGarde]

Excellent,now plz give us a report (i vaughly remember > - 20 or something in Test - A col,rather i am not interested in the proprietory part) but very keen to know the actual outcome since 10 months (approx 250 bars) of this Yesterday effecting To-day.
This being calculated just on 1 day price ?
Looking forward to that report.

Hi Ashish,

I should have 10 month data somewhere but need to locate it...will post it...as soon as possible....Bear With Me........No Pun Intended..

Proprietary Calculation was mentioned there to the specific person that I had replied to....I have no secrets....Program is undergoing some changes hopefully with more accuracy....If you want it....you are most welcome....but runs on MS Visual Foxpro 6.0

Do excuse moi for replying in this Thread....


Happy & Safe Trading

SavantGarde

 

[uasish]

Feeling realy gratified as you wanted to share your code,however believe me i am really not interested in the formula but the result only,will wait for it.
Rather will look forward to the logic & the methodology ,that will be learning how to fish ,least interested in the fish.

 

[SavantGarde]

Feeling realy gratified as you wanted to share your code,however believe me i am really not interested in the formula but the result only,will wait for it.
Rather will look forward to the logic & the methodology ,that will be learning how to fish ,least interested in the fish.

Ashish Checkout the Link, might be of interest....in your endeavour

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Fibonaccin-StepNumber.html


SavantGarde

 

[kkseal]

A famous statistician would never travel by airplane, because he had studied air travel and estimated the probability of there being a bomb on any given flight was 1 in a million, and he was not prepared to accept these odds. One day a colleague met him at a conference far from home.

"How did you get here, by train?"

"No, I flew"

"What about your possibiltiy of a bomb?"

"Well, I began thinking that if the odds of one bomb are 1:million, then the odds of TWO bombs are (1/1,000,000) x (1/1,000,000). This is a very, very small probability, which I can accept. So, now I bring my own bomb along!"

Happy & Safe Trading

SavantGarde

HaHaHa .... Great one Savant!

Regards,
Kalyan.

 

[kkseal]

It is STATIONARY in relative to NOW ,'Photo Finish logic for horse racing' ,all probabilities for NEXT & its discrete finite change of state ,the probable change can be projected in the 'Set' (probability set theory).
Reference points ? dont we look in today (on mkt live whether > yesterday's H ,that is the immediate Res ),is'nt it not a reference ?
The logic of non-stationary or continuous price discovery,eternally can go on this Bid/Ask, ACCEPTED ,but you/i being stationary in the train's track cant say which direction the train will go ,is what ? two possibility
Same
Opposite
Same from what reference point ,Previuos State
Opposite to what reference point ,Previuos State
So now dont we have a reference here ?
Hence it's ,the State's ,change & its probable path can be mathametically calculated.
Your logic for every thing being relative is accepted ,hence TIME (the Y axis in chart).
Relative to time so my analogy :=
..... stability of a finite difference scheme (FDS). It only consider FDSs having one time dimension, but any number of spatial dimensions.
Thks kalyan you are helping me for my development.

Hey man Asish, I was just joking.

Let's just trade and develop our systems the best we can.

Your knowledge of Maths/Stats is impressive, so maybe you'll hit upon the perfect system someday. As for me, i have no such dreams for my knowledge is too limited.

But this much i know the mkt cannot be captured by any conventional mathematical model (maybe bits & pieces, but not the whole). Had it been so, all the answers would have been well-known by now.

One think we can bank upon is our mind. There are a lot of things the human mind is intuitively aware of. Like there is no word in any (Eucledian) lexicon for the shape of a cloud, but the human mind knows what a cloud is.

Regards,
Kalyan.

P.S. : Even 'previous' in 'previous state' is relative, isn't it? The 'previous' on the weekly is not the same as the 'previous' on the daily (in fact the former encompasses five 'states' of the latter)

While on the subject of 'relative' here's something i read on the back of a matchbox :-

Success is relative, the more success the more relatives.