Raja,
Though, I myself am not a follower of this method but I can safely vouch that there are serious mistakes in your analysis and results. The graphs that you have posted are seriously wrong in interpretation. From what I know of this method so far, your exits and reentries are wrong most of the times. I dont have sufficient time to post the corrections to your analysis, but I would recommend you to reconsider and recheck it. Preferably, dont try to build an AFL for it coz this method, does have some bit of discretion.
Coming to your other view that EMA/MA crossovers do not work. I would strongly vote against it. There are plenty successful MA crossover based systems that are present out there. Like rkkarni has said before, with proper MM and SL and risk apetite, the crossovers system do work very well. Add to it the fact that TWH posts his trades here, I wont doubt the intent here. ''
Just my 2 cents.
Best Regards
Kindly let me know what is wrong in the chart, so that i can correct and come out with correct report.
If this is a complete rule based system , why it should not work automatically
If this is a discretionary method, then i have already told that Moving averages can be used discretionarily, my point was that mechanically it doesnt work thats all.
Everybody blaming on moneymangement and risk management for a losing strategy.
Monymangement is indeed very important but it has become an overheated issue people dont even look for a logic in their strategy and if they lose they start blaming on money management and psychology.
All i can say "Numbers Dont Lie" if you find mistakes in trades tell me i will correct it and still am confident that i can prove that overall its a losing system,if at all it is a system.
PS:The idea behind this method is not bad,with some modifications and traded discretionarily it should work.But mechanically it doesnt.