according to the article, currently the min stamp duty is levied by maharashtra i.e. 0.0001% and
0.005% by other states! this is going to be changed to uniform one i.e. 0.003% if passed in winter session of parliament!
now my question is v simple:
- what can't zerodha customise their calculator and incorporate these charges to be more specific, clear and transparent? though some kind of customisation is required, it won't be 35 (28 states and 7 UTs) combinations. even if that is not possible then WHY -
- they mention "Stamp Duty is charged at 0.01% or Rs. 50 per contract note - whichever is lower and
*Stamp duty is charged according to the Karnataka Stamp Duty Act and is not included in the brokerage calculator."
but the article says that Southern states like Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka (where zerodha is based out), which do not levy stamp duty, might gain in the new system. SO IT LOOKS A BIG CONFUSION as according to zerodha calculator stamp duty is 0.01% what is this whole mystery of stamp duty and x% charged by zerodha?:annoyed:
and the most imp point is even if everything is correct at zerodha's end, then consider this example where you BUY 1 Nifty contract @6000. the stamp duty for this would be Rs. 30. OMG! This is 1.5 times more than the brokerage of Rs.20 which i am paying to zerodha! Simply this means that Zerodha's claim of cheap brokerage house is wrong. infact the retail guys are the biggest losers if they trade with zerodha as they are paying more stamp duty than brokerage!
Same applies to option contracts too where the Stamp Duty is calculated on turnover of option contract which in this case would be again more than Rs. 30 (if i consider ATM option trade of Nifty). ur giving more than the brokerage as stamp duty. it kills a retail trader on the contrary who joins these brokerages to minimise cost!