There are breakouts and there are breakout failures(traps).None is superior over the other.
Pure breakout trades are slightly riskier,retracement breakout trades are less riskier.
If you are not comfortable trading breakouts , trade as per your own style of trading retracements.
If a particular stock does not retrace let it go , search for another trade.How can you have best of both worlds with mindset for only one pattern ?
Dear newuser_RK,
There is no rule guide that will say breakout will be actual one or a fake one. Its a process result of many things. Many investors wary of stocks hitting 52weeks highs. But let me tell you all the great minds of past have made fortunes from stocks hitting newer highs.
But you need to study on it. Those stocks which are posting good results QoQ or YoY, will most likely hit 100%...200%....500%...thats a story. Imagine if you have are afraid of those stocks hitting 52weeks highs, and just stayed away. There are many examples in our indian market. ...Lupin is one...
So in short stocks with good fundamentals and better prospects will likely break and sustain breakouts. I am not saying you need to study fundamentals for this. But yes the list of stocks you are studying daily or want to trade must be ok with fundamentals. That much you can do...
Observing volumes is must on breakouts. Institutions cant hide their volumes in stocks.
Last but the only important thing is, The 'base' before breakout....It may be any base formation like....Flag...Wedge...or triangle may be....the time taken in base...volume during base...mostly near to boundaries...will give you a clue...stock is attracting volumes for upside or readying for a failure...
With proper SL and risk management you can trade breakouts...Its better to protect you capital for long innings...