Hello Anant Ji,
Indeed, its a combined effort of you and SG sir. Kudos to you two :clap:
As far as distractions are concerned, you are correct that now there wont be any.
Although it's an individual's choice to modify, I suggest other guys to not compare and try to make a hybrid out of it as it may add a bit of confusion if not more. This way the thread's moment and ideologies/strategies can be grasped easily and most important, clearly.
by the way, Anant Ji,
for those who don't have Wilder's MA can use EMA of (2n-1) where n = number of periods of Wilder's MA.
So in this case one can use the following EMAs:
EMA(9) ~ Wilder's MA(5) (2*5-1=9).
EMA(15) ~ Wilder's MA(8)
EMA(25) ~ Wilder's MA(13).
