@Zerodha,
if you are really serious about Pi. Below are few of my suggestions.
1. Look at esignal/ninjatrade/Ami. They have basic drawing tools. Notice how they all work the same. e.g a simple horizontal line or trendline or ray. Pi should have the same things and should work as expected. we should not be telling you that you need to include a horizontal line and how it should work.
2. Other features like pages/layouts..etc. Again they work the same way that we expect them. Pi should do the same.
3. Templates/cross hairs/chart default settings. Again they work and behave the same way in all these charting platforms. Pi should do the same.
I don't understand why we have to report these basic standard features to be added in PI as though they are something new.
But notice how these basic standard features don't even work as expected and we simply have to report it as an issue.
Bottom line : All the use case scenarios are available in Ami/Meta/Esignal/Ninja..take your pick and see how they work and simply make them work in Pi.
So why not release next Pi with all the basic standard features added and FIXED and then release. This will make using Pi much easier, otherwise there is no way people will switch to Pi if basic things don't work as expected even after 10 versions.
Finally the data issue which is again critical.
if you are really serious about Pi. Below are few of my suggestions.
1. Look at esignal/ninjatrade/Ami. They have basic drawing tools. Notice how they all work the same. e.g a simple horizontal line or trendline or ray. Pi should have the same things and should work as expected. we should not be telling you that you need to include a horizontal line and how it should work.
2. Other features like pages/layouts..etc. Again they work the same way that we expect them. Pi should do the same.
3. Templates/cross hairs/chart default settings. Again they work and behave the same way in all these charting platforms. Pi should do the same.
I don't understand why we have to report these basic standard features to be added in PI as though they are something new.
But notice how these basic standard features don't even work as expected and we simply have to report it as an issue.
Bottom line : All the use case scenarios are available in Ami/Meta/Esignal/Ninja..take your pick and see how they work and simply make them work in Pi.
So why not release next Pi with all the basic standard features added and FIXED and then release. This will make using Pi much easier, otherwise there is no way people will switch to Pi if basic things don't work as expected even after 10 versions.
Finally the data issue which is again critical.