well I guess I mentioned it in past (maybe, not sure).
Stocks I selected were good businesses with good management( except cairn india) which can survive for at least 5 (or 10) years, regardless of the market condition. If the company keep doing what they were doing in the past, one can hold them forever Just like coca cola, exxon mobile etc, until and unless an idiot tries to screw it up. Secondly, I don't check the price to exit no value investor should, I look at their quarterly report to make sure its on track, I have a stop loss of 3 bad quarter in general cases. I can give you a whole lecture on my check list but to cut it short.
I will never buy a business, no matter how wonderful it is, until and unless it is available at some discount to its intrinsic value. You'll be amazed to know how much you can compound by buying a business just 20% cheaper in comparison with fair price businesses.
again, cutting the winners is not a bad idea in general cases, this is what charlie munger did for around 10 years, buffett before him, but what if you bought Apple during 1980 and sell in 1985, buying Berkshire Hathway in 60s. wipro in 90s and sell in few years later?? then cutting your winner might not sound a good idea. I keep looking for next berkshire when nobody knows about it, I have few in my list and I'll keep on looking..
Stocks I selected were good businesses with good management( except cairn india) which can survive for at least 5 (or 10) years, regardless of the market condition. If the company keep doing what they were doing in the past, one can hold them forever Just like coca cola, exxon mobile etc, until and unless an idiot tries to screw it up. Secondly, I don't check the price to exit no value investor should, I look at their quarterly report to make sure its on track, I have a stop loss of 3 bad quarter in general cases. I can give you a whole lecture on my check list but to cut it short.
I will never buy a business, no matter how wonderful it is, until and unless it is available at some discount to its intrinsic value. You'll be amazed to know how much you can compound by buying a business just 20% cheaper in comparison with fair price businesses.
again, cutting the winners is not a bad idea in general cases, this is what charlie munger did for around 10 years, buffett before him, but what if you bought Apple during 1980 and sell in 1985, buying Berkshire Hathway in 60s. wipro in 90s and sell in few years later?? then cutting your winner might not sound a good idea. I keep looking for next berkshire when nobody knows about it, I have few in my list and I'll keep on looking..
Last edited: